Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SalvageData

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:16, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SalvageData

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Sources present are trivial mentions, a press release, dubious listicles, and so on. The creator of the article appears to be UPE as well. Madeline (part of me) 19:16, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Computing. Madeline (part of me) 19:16, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:27, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Fails WP:GNG and I'd say it meets WP:G11 as well. Uhai (talk) 13:04, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per WP:G11. Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:40, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as WP:G11. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:06, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I saw the reference 1 of CNBC and initially I thought this can be notable but it turns out to be a press release. Fifthapril (talk) 08:38, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.