Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sami A. Khan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. -- RoySmith (talk) 03:02, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sami A. Khan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:AUTHOR. Khan is a single book author. The article was created by editor Sunnysin, a single-purpose account. The article was proded by WikiDan61 shortly after its creation for lack of references. After external links were provided, WikiDan61 removed the prod. Delete or Merge and Redirect to book Red Jihad. --Bejnar (talk) 20:26, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Martin451 23:07, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Martin451 23:07, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:21, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to Red Jihad. The author clearly fails WP:AUTHOR, but maybe not forever. Also please address the plagiarism of the biographical details in this interview. Lagrange 613 01:12, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero | My Talk 05:25, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Would someone please close this, so that we can Merge and redirect to Red Jihad. --Bejnar (talk) 10:50, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:49, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.