Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Castillejo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 17:23, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Castillejo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested by Etzo (talk · contribs) with no explanation. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:43, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 12:54, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 12:54, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 12:54, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no significant coverage or senior appearances, fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 13:15, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as already stated above, he has not received significant coverage or appeared in a fully pro league, meaning the article fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So what do you have against this article? Fine, delete them all. Etzo (talk) 20:02, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you'd have bothered reading the above comments then you'd know what they have against the article. That being that it fails the relevant guidelines. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:47, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Says user who insists that being national team's coach hasn't peen relevant in Hyypiä's career... Etzo (talk) 21 April 2012
- And that is relevant to this discussion, how exactly? Seems like the tactic of someone who knows he's lost his side of the debate. Please just accept the burgeoning consensus that this player isn't notable by WP standards. Pretty simple stuff. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:13, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.