Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Lustenberger
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 05:56, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Samuel Lustenberger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can find no evidence of him having played for Lucerne, and his other club appearances are not enough to pass WP:ATHLETE. Due to the absence of significant coverage, he also fails WP:GNG Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:28, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:30, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. —Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:32, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. —Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:32, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I proposed the article for deletion because he had never played in a league higher than the second level of Swiss football (Challenge League). However, I found that he did play in the second round of the 2007–08 Swiss Cup against Super League club FC Thun. Would that be sufficient to pass WP:ATHLETE? Jogurney (talk) 13:45, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That depends on if SC Cham is fully pro as well. If it is, he passes WP:FOOTYN, and should be kept. A quick look at the clubs article suggests that it isn't fully pro, but that's far from definitive. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:20, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as article creator. He is notable enough by WP:ATHLETE standards in my eyes to merit an article. GiantSnowman 18:57, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- As the article's creator, can you provide a source for his appearances for Lucerne? I nominated this article because wasn't able to find any sources to support that he had played for Lucerne's first team. If he did, he obviously passes WP:ATHLETE. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:04, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- His profile, which was the basis for the creation of the article and showed notability, has been removed from Football.ch...I can find no other source. GiantSnowman 23:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Given that the Swiss Football Association has retracted his profile, and there is no other source to support its contents, I think its safe to assume that the data it provided was not accurate. Since SC Cham play in the Third division, his league appearances aren't enough to pass WP:ATHLETE, and the cup appearance does not meet WP:FOOTYN. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:22, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Yep, you're right - no sources = no notability. Delete GiantSnowman 00:01, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Given that the Swiss Football Association has retracted his profile, and there is no other source to support its contents, I think its safe to assume that the data it provided was not accurate. Since SC Cham play in the Third division, his league appearances aren't enough to pass WP:ATHLETE, and the cup appearance does not meet WP:FOOTYN. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:22, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- His profile, which was the basis for the creation of the article and showed notability, has been removed from Football.ch...I can find no other source. GiantSnowman 23:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Article is about an athlete who at most played in one cup match against a pro team. I was unable to find sources for this person which would satisfy WP:GNG, so I believe he is non-notable. Jogurney (talk) 17:07, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.