Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandy Creek High School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn/keep. Not much else needs to be said, thanks for updating WP:ORG. tedder (talk) 23:12, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sandy Creek High School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:ORG, this school is not notable. ɳoɍɑfʈ^Talk! 19:54, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It is generally argued and overall community consensus that high school pages should be kept as they generally have verifiable and notable content, most specifically related to sports teams. --Shirik (talk) 20:01, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, but shouldn't that be reflected in WP:ORG so that editors know? I mean, if consensus is established to the point that it becomes a guideline, then the guideline should be written somewhere, right? ɳoɍɑfʈ^Talk! 20:18, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, speedy close. As Shirik accurately points out, there's an established consensus, and the nominator has given no reason why an exception would be appropriate here. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:03, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:06, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:06, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did some research on the consensus mentioned above, and found where it was written. I've updated Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)#Non-commercial_organizations to reflect what I've learned about the consensus. Hopefully this will reduce the number of high schools being nominated. Admin, if I can withdraw the nomination, let's bring it to a speedy close. This has resulted in a wikipedia guideline being improved, so I thank everyone for bringing their knowledge to bear. ɳoɍɑfʈ^Talk! 21:02, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.