Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Foroozani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:56, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sara Foroozani

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable academic. 2 of the papers listed as publications appear to be conference papers only, no evidence her work is widely read or cited. Fails WP:SCHOLAR, sources provide no evidence this person satisfies GNG. Fyddlestix (talk) 14:52, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 14:52, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 14:52, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - can't find anything, tried to find Farsi sources, no luck —Мандичка^YO 😜 15:03, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: It is possible that a 24 year old has academic accomplishments, but such a thing would be exceedingly rare. In the humanities, in particular, a career isn't well enough established to be referred to by others until a decade later, at least. There aren't indications in the article that the subject passes the guidelines, either, so this may be accidental vanity or a misunderstanding. Hithladaeus (talk) 16:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There is no real claim of notability. Agricola44 (talk) 16:44, 27 May 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails GNG .–Davey2010^Talk 01:18, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Can find no indication of notability. Perhaps it's WP:TOOSOON. E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:09, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.