Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Brooks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:03, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Brooks

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Also included in this nomination:

Julia Porter (Law & Order: Criminal Intent)

This is a textbook case of why we have WP:CRYSTAL. Judging by this press release, these are not actually the names of any characters being introduced on Law & Order: Criminal Intent this season. Articles have already been created at the correct usernames, and I do not think this justifies a redirect as it won't be a plausible search term once the season premieres. Redfarmer (talk) 01:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Agree with nom. Shadowjams (talk) 08:44, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Redfarmer (talk) 11:42, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Agree. Jrh7925 (talk) 23:45, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Agree. Pages were created prematurely way before that press statement. --66.217.112.3 (talk) 19:30, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.