Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Larson (4th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:03, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Larson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Neither the relationship nor the game show role is notable. . A classic illustration of why we need NOT INHERITED & WP:NOT TABLOID DGG ( talk ) 04:44, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unencyclopedic. Neither winning a game show, dating someone famous, nor being considered attractive make someone of encyclopedic interest. The coverage of her does not appear to be really 'significant', just run of the mill tabloid stories. --Michig (talk) 12:33, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notability is not inherited. Hence, delete. Roodog2k (talk) 15:37, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 23:16, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 23:16, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 23:16, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No change in my rationale from the 3rd nomination of this subject; really lucky model and Fear Factor winner who had a Hollywood boyfriend for a little while, and very sub-quality tabloid sourcing (the Review-Journal cites are from a high-quality newspaper with a tabloid celebrity columnist). Nate • (chatter) 01:51, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.