Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarani (community)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:18, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sarani (community)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A theory from one author which hasn't received any attention in reliable sources. Same author also advanced Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cebuano Visayan State, deleted for the same reasons. Fram (talk) 07:51, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 07:51, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 07:51, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and reasons from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cebuano Visayan State. --hueman1 (talk) 12:30, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Second in motion to the views of @HueMan1: and @Fram:.JWilz12345 (talk) 13:01, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: It's a thesis. Most of the sources are from Pagan himself. Other than that, I barely found anything about it. _SUPER ^ASTIG 16:15, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete: Is Pangan the one who created the wiki article himself? You just can't quote yourself. And where's the copy of the thesis? Is this published (or unpublished?) in a journal? This is a good thesis though but needs peer review from historians. You just can't make big claims and have it not validated and verified. Though I find some footnotes from Sala-Boza, Villanueva, ang Pigafetta's comments (the legend!) intriguing too. —Allenjambalaya (talk) 08:30, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Allenjambalaya: Probably not, but I highly doubt it. Seems legit eh? —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 12:09, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.