Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sasha Eisenman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 08:20, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sasha Eisenman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no claim to notability for this photographer. Irbisgreif (talk) 22:01, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This New York Times article is about Eisenman, but has insufficient depth to show notability. This same article is the only hit on Newsbank also. Kevin (talk) 22:30, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - concur with Kevin. I could not find any more than he did. -- Whpq (talk) 14:53, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 21:22, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW (Talk) 01:37, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW (Talk) 01:25, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:CREATIVE and, as the previous two editors have suggested, there is very little coverage of him.. Location (talk) 04:41, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, the NYT blurb is an in-house nod to him as a worker. Abductive (reasoning) 05:49, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.