Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sci-fi Shapes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 02:49, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sci-fi Shapes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. No holdings at all in worldcat, and nothing even resembling a reliable reference. I can only conclude that the purpose of this and the two adjacent articles is advertising for the books. DGG ( talk ) 01:29, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This book fails our notability guideline for books. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:04, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I would also argue against merging it into one article, as none of the MLG books seem to pass notability guidelines. There are some COI concerns as well. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:01, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:44, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:44, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.