Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Banister

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 03:52, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Banister

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Resume on Wikipedia. The page cites the subject's linkedin and angel.co pages, and a number of sources that are about other things. The Politico article names him only to attribute quotes, and the New York Times article is a list of names without commentary on him. Lacks coverage in WP:RS. FalconK (talk) 05:45, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 05:45, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 05:45, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 05:45, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 18:00, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A WP:BEFORE search reveals next to nothing on the subject. As per WP:N does not receive significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent secondary sources. Not notable. --ARoseWolf (Talk) 18:14, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.