Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Sabourin
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. If he does get called up, then this can be recreated. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:04, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Scott Sabourin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 08:00, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: Article on a marginal minor-leaguer created, as part of a pattern of routine and knowing defiance of notability standards resulting in several hundred AfDs/CSDs/PRODs, by an editor since community banned from new article creation. Has never met NHOCKEY, no evidence of meeting the GNG beyond routine sports reporting explicitly debarred by WP:ROUTINE. Ravenswing 11:01, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:26, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:26, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:26, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete after start of 2016-17 NHL season confirms that the multi-year NHL prospect does not move up from junior hockey league.Canuckle (talk) 19:42, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Sam Sailor 17:04, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Sam Sailor 17:04, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.