Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sea Park (ship)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I withdraw my nomination per the comments below. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 10:02, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sea Park (ship)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Related discussion. This seems to only have coverage in large indexes that could probably apply to thousands of ships. Qwerfjkl talk 20:11, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of convict ship voyages to Western Australia#Voyages transporting convicts to Western Australia. Redirects are cheap. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:00, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:30, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:30, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:30, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - by a small view on parts of its history, it was a convict ship to Western Australia, and emigrant ship to South Australia, - such a dual use/function provides a good basis for expansion and keeping. JarrahTree 11:54, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Article was created from "dead" WikiLink and initially only basic information and references were to hand. Existence of the article gives other editors opportunity to add information linked to other articles about convict transportation and emigration to Australia. Convicts continued to be referred to by the name of the ship that brought them to Australia for many years after their arrival, so there will be many official documents and personal memoirs that mention this vessel. Kahuzi (talk) 17:27, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Sources added for build and loss. Meets ships(notability) criteria as over 100 tons Lyndaship (talk) 08:30, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.