Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Berdy
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2011 July 7. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 00:51, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Sean Berdy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Child actor whose only notable role was in a direct-to-video film, The Sandlot 2. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:09, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I followed the creator's suggestion and googled, but was unable to find any reliable independent sources confirming this actor's notability. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:27, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ouch. There were indeed reliable independent sources to be found,[1] and they do confirm the facts in the article... but as it is a brief spurt, this minimum coverage pretty much fails WP:GNG... just as his brief acting career fails WP:ENT. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:51, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Jujutacular talk 00:55, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:GNG, WP:SPAM, WP:RS, WP:AUTO, WP:COI, WP:SPA, etc., etc., etc. Qworty (talk) 02:54, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete for all the reasons tallied up by Qworty. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:28, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Administrator note The article subject added {{delete}} which I took as a request to delete the article per WP:CSD#G7. However, the editor then recreated the article with the Article Wizard with substantially the same content. I therefore restored all revisions of the article and reverted the closure of this AfD. Speedy delete doesn't get you a free pass from an AfD. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:15, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete... but no... not quite speedy-able, as article is sourcable and makes no outrageous or libelous claims. And yes, while article about Sean Berdy was written by editor User:Seanberdy,[2] and even if the new editor might not have been aware of Wikipedia's concerns toward COI, the article now belongs to Wikipedia's, and tone "might" have been corrected through regular editing... so let's show a little politeness to a newcomer. Sheesh. The basic problem, simply put, is that this individual's very short career fails WP:ENT. And while yes, the individual does have coverage for his role in Sandlot 2 while also being hearing impaired,[3] this makes this almost a WP:BLP1E. So until he receives coverage for other things and/or his film career grows, this one is simply WP:TOOSOON. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:51, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.