Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selling Art Online

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per WP:SNOW as a personal essay and for being somewhat promotional enough to where I think it'd be speedyable as such. (WP:G11) Note that the same user made this and Art Marketing Online. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:45, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Selling Art Online

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be original research reddogsix (talk) 03:47, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTESSAY. ansh666 04:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An original research essay from a WP:SPA account, sharing at least some text with the previously deleted Art Marketing Online. The article has a disproportionate focus on one recent site (artsy.net) without mention of longer-established sites such as Saatchi Online, etc. AllyD (talk) 06:47, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:48, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTESSAY. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:05, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - basically an advertorial. There's some room, I think, for something like Online art sales which covers things like Saatchi Online and the online spaces set up by major auction houses like Sotheby's and Christie's but this isn't that. Stalwart111 08:02, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.