Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serplogic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Article was indeed speedily deleted, making this moot. (non-admin close) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:14, 15 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Serplogic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: This article does not have any independent reliable sources, as Serplogic is NOT a notable brand or website for inclusion in Wikipedia. Of the three references, one is a press release. Please delete this article.

Strong Delete: After reviewing the website of Serplogic, I found that they "sell Wikipedia pages", and editorial links (pay-to-play), which is against TOS of all news websites they are selling. Also, the website has no notability, aside from one news link they purchased, in which still shows no impact the site's made to be worthy of article space. Furthermore, the fact that this subject sells Wikipedia pages, I think Serplogic should be blacklisted from Wiki for deceitful practices. "AJ Agrawal" from Inc, he is a well-known pay-to-play contributing author who gives editorial links to random people in exchange for money. "Tommy Macdonald" upon doing research I found that his business is solely run by pay-to-play services with unethical writers who are desperate for money. Additionally, the Digital Journal article is a press release - press releases are not reliable sources. Tech Cocktail isn't a reliable source either. Macdonald also has a ton of disputes on ripoff report claiming he has scammed people and sells blackhat services to manipulate Google's SEO algorithm. Macdonald is lucky Google hasn't penalized his website, that's until someone snitches. I don't think anything else should be said except: speedy deletion. Scorpion293 (talk) 19:54, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This discussion page was created without the {{afd2}} template and never transcluded to a daily log. Fixed now--I offer no opinion on the nomination itself at this time. @Scorpion293: For future nominations, please fully follow the procedures at WP:AFDHOWTO. --Finngall ^talk 21:20, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. --Finngall ^talk 21:24, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. --Finngall ^talk 21:24, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. --Finngall ^talk 21:24, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This article should be speedy deleted A7, and not wait for the AfD process.--Jersey92 (talk) 04:36, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.