Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sex and the Matrix
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to 2000 MTV Movie Awards. Cirt (talk) 11:32, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sex and the Matrix (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable comedy short. Suggest merge annd redirect to 2000 MTV Movie Awards on which it was origially shown. magnius (talk) 10:33, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Redirect 14 news hits you can redirect without a AFD. Ikip (talk) 14:52, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have to disagree that it's "non-notable", but my reasons are subjective. (In case you're interested, I feel it merges "Sex and the City" and "The Matrix" seamlessly, with high production values and in-character cameos -- it's the best of the shorts I've seen on the MTV Movie Awards.) My real problem is that I don't know how to defend my opinion that something is or is not notable. What would it take to convince you? What would be a "notable" comedy short? ShawnVW (talk) 07:47, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Per WP:Notability: one that has "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". See the page for details. --Cybercobra (talk) 04:28, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 04:23, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect. Not notable by itself. Darrenhusted (talk) 11:44, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:41, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect as per nom. --Cyclopia (talk) 11:51, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.