Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexual XXXXX!
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The "keep" !votes are based on WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:INHERITED. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:20, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Sexual XXXXX! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced; fails WP:NALBUMS; contested PROD — Jeff G. ツ 17:21, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I can't find a "reliable source", but the album seems to be known, even on Latin America. Diego Grez what's up? 17:26, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]- Asked 10 Pound Hammer to strike this. Me lazee :-p Diego Grez what's up? 22:52, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Are you kidding me, Diego? If you can't find a reliable source then it's not notable. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:13, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep - All the other albums have articles associated with them, why not this one? The album is well know, as is the artist. I notice that some, if indeed all the discography don't have sources. I see no reason not to keep it. scope_creep (talk) 23:37, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:05, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, notable band=notable album. --Closedmouth (talk) 05:56, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as article fails notability criteria for albums. Armbrust Talk Contribs 12:49, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I couldn't find any place other than the BuckTickZone website that shows this album. The only thing that's there is track listings, so there really doesn't seem to be a point in having a separate article for the album. I suspect that may be the case for most, if not all, of their records. HubcapD (talk) 21:42, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.