Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shabbulb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No opposition to someone creating the redirect, although I'll note it's not mentioned in the target. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:09, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shabbulb

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:NPRODUCT. The page was created by Sunlitemfg and who seems to be a COI/PAID editor. This is straight WP:PROMO. Jbh ^Talk 19:03, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – At this time. Wikipedia is not intended or meant for the promotion or the advertisement of new products or ideas as they relate to Shabbos. If and when the item or idea impacts the rationale behind Shabbos. Then it become encyclopedia worthy. However, nice work to the author who edited the piece. We could use your talent here to improve existing articles. ShoesssS ^Talk 19:31, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, article reads like an ad crossed with a pamphlet for the bulb, and said product has not generated the coverage needed for inclusion on Wikipedia.--SamHolt6 (talk) 20:05, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. L293D (☎ • ✎) 21:08, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 21:10, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails GNG and NPRODUCT. L293D (☎ • ✎) 21:12, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Although I have heard plenty of people talk about it, and heard rabbis debate it, it does not get enough main stream coverage to meet WP:GNG. - Galatz ^Talk 21:20, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, maybe. Based on the limited sources, this doesn't warrant a separate article, and the promotional tone doesn't help. But since it does have a couple of sources, a footnoted sentence could be added at Shabbat lamp, an article that was kept by an AfD in 2009, or at the more general article Electricity on Shabbat. --Arxiloxos (talk) 21:48, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Shabbat lamp per above. While neat, and a clever possible solution to Orthodox Sabbath working/non-working rules, fails the GNG. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 22:26, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Shabbat lamp. Otherwise the page name is WP:ADVERTISING. Yoninah (talk) 06:05, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.