Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shades (1999 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (nom w). Geschichte (talk) 18:09, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shades (1999 film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:UNSOURCED, WP:NFSOURCES and WP:NFO. Found nothing in a WP:BEFORE search and there’s no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. The Film Creator (talk) 02:22, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:35, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Review at CineMagazine [1]. Not enough on its own, but a start. DonaldD23 talk to me 02:47, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per the above source, this one, and this. SL93 (talk) 02:54, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, thanks to the additional sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:20, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:08, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll admit when I did the WP:BEFORE search on Google, I only found insignificant coverage results found in the English-language (after all, this is a Belgian production). I withdraw per consensus and per WP:NEXIST. The Film Creator (talk) 12:45, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.