Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaley Scott

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article's subject is found to lack notability. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 19:39, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shaley Scott

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a non-notable actress on every level. I can't find any significant coverage of her. edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī😎 03:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bharatiya 29 11:17, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No signs of better satisfying WP:CREATIVE. SwisterTwister talk 21:40, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:33, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 04:11, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 04:11, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 04:11, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the subject is better known as a singer songwriter than as an actress and has a new album coming out this year. See [1] and [2] I think she passes WP:BASIC. Atlantic306 (talk) 22:12, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete it's WP:TOOSOON. I sometimes end a comment with TOO:SOON even though it looks unlikely to me because the fan who wrote the article is so enthusiastic that I want to be kind. Here , it seems clear that this may actually be a notable artist just launching a career. Problem is, RS coverage so far is from the hometown paper. news search: [3].E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:18, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Currently does not pass either WP:CREATIVE or WP:GNG. Might be a case of WP:TOOSOON, but not even convinced about that. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:33, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable enough, and lack of independent verifiable sources. Cindlevet (talk) 17:04, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.