Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shark Attack films
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was uhhh...no consensus. Mailer Diablo 16:57, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
prodded by Messedrocker and by Rory096: It doesn't look like this will become a great article. Even with some improvement, I doubt "shark attack movie" is any sort of genre Deprodded and so brought to AfD. The major quality issues concerning the article aside (it is practically unreadable), these are three unnotable made for tv movies. Eusebeus 10:41, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Conditional weak keep. The article must be "gutted" and moved to Shark Attack (1999 television movie), or something similar. The sequels can be mentioned there. PJM 10:55, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete - These don't sound very notable, but then again we do have articles on even more obscure stuff. -- Hirudo 13:16, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Worthwhile addition to wikipedia films. Notability is slightly questionable but considering some films which are far lesser known which are on here, I consider it worthy of having an article.--Cini 13:33, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Nearly identical to a recently deleted article discussed here: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Shark_attack_saga. Looks like this current one was created at around the time the first was nominated for deletion. Arguments there apply to this one as well; the article is nearly unsalvagable, and the subject isn't notable enough for a serious cleanup. WarpstarRider 23:59, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- SPEEDY DELETE as - db-repost - of Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Shark_attack_saga San Saba 04:20, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep, bad faith nomination. Eusebeus is systematically bringing disputed prods to AfD without regard to merits of dispute. Monicasdude 14:11, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete because I am sick of Monicasdude's identical vote-spam --Ajdz 18:06, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment if that's your only reason, please don't
voterecommend. Feel free to disagree with Monicasdude, but base yourvotesrecommendations on the actual article up for Afd. -- Hirudo 18:13, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Actually, we're not voting here (as in the former VFD)...we're "recommending". Nontheless, your point is valid. PJM 20:47, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment if that's your only reason, please don't
- Keep - looks to be three separate films. At least there aren't three separate articles - let's keep it that way. -- infinity0 18:47, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.