Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shubham khandelwal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:52, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shubham khandelwal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable writer. Reads like a resume-ad for his services. References do not appear to be independent or to establish notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 09:21, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Darylgolden^(talk) Ping when replying 11:07, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 06:34, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 06:34, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non notable amateur journalist writing for non notable publications. Jupitus Smart 06:36, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable journalist fails WP:BASIC, WP:GNG.--Elton-Rodrigues 15:53, 7 July 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elton-Rodrigues (talk • contribs)
Delete Not notable, definitely a case of too soon.--SouthernNights (talk) 23:58, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:07, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.