Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silhouette (band)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nakon 04:46, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Silhouette (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bringing this to AfD because the speedy tag was removed and I am unable to fully evaluate the notability of this band. Page was already speedily deleted once under A7. Article lists a few references, but they are mostly in German. Looking at the refs though, none of them seem to be reliable. If someone (probably a German speaker), can establish WP:N I will withdraw my nomination. -War wizard90 (talk) 06:06, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 06:07, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 06:07, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 06:07, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove this page from AfD because this site is an actual neo-prog band from the Netherlands. If you would need the original page for Silhouette (band) translated or checked, please let us know on http://www.silhouetteband.nl/ This page is legit. 37.153.235.5 (talk) 16:13, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:16, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:19, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.