Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sippai (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 05:57, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sippai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

"Despite the film being completed and a teaser being released in late 2013, the film failed to see a theatrical release" says it all, really. Sent to draft, restored because it's over 90 days old, frequently namechecked as a potential AfD candidate, it's time this 2013 article about a film unreleased in 2013 and since was consigned to the flames of Mount Doom. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:49, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, it's resumed filming again [1], and about a dozen other stories confirming the same in semi-RS sources. See the news link above. Oaktree b (talk) 13:34, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's a 2017 story!!! It's taken longer to film - just this time around - than LOTR if we are to take those reports seriously... There's another lot from 2021. Given a track record of 10 years of empty reports, why don't we wait until it's actually, you know, released? Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:28, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
IT's still SIGCOV. This might be like the last Duke Nukem game, vaporware for 20 yrs or more. Oaktree b (talk) 15:24, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.