Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siyani Chambers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. JohnCD (talk) 22:53, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Siyani Chambers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not my usual area, but I dod not see how ivy league rookie of the year in college basketball amounts to notability. I'd me more inclined to call it a junior award, with the meaning might be notable some day. DGG ( talk ) 03:05, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 16:39, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 16:39, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 16:40, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Has had a notable high school and college career. Candleabracadabra (talk) 19:42, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Rookie of the year award was only part of what made him notable. He was a major member of a Harvard team that received nationwide media coverage due to its run in the NCAA tournament. Much of this coverage focused specifically on Chambers and his contributions to the team. Furthermore, he was the subject of quite a bit of media coverage in the preseason due to his inclusion on the Cousy Award watchlist (given annually to the best point guard in D1) and the large expectations for Harvard. Rupert'sscribe (talk) 01:11, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.