Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skeem (2011 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 21:03, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Skeem (2011 film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM. Please see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axe of Vengeance and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tales Of Nazir. SITH (talk) 17:30, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 17:32, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:37, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:37, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It's a little hard finding stuff out there, since it kind of seems like not all of the South African media outlets put their work online, but I did find some coverage. It looks like there was a huge kerfuffle a few years back about someone copying his film. I also found where the film's title track was covered in a book (looks like this was specifically made for the film). I only made brief mention of this in the article since I didn't really want to work on a big soundtrack section at this point in time. I don't think that the award the film received is major enough to really keep on that alone, but the amount of coverage that the film festival and the award win received show that it's something that should give at least partial notability. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 19:39, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as perWP:HEY as the article has been substantially improved since nomination including content referenced to multiple reliable sources coverage such as National newspapers including a secondary review in the South African Mail and Guardian, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 21:18, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think there is now sufficient coverage - notability may also be satisfied via the award route. Nosebagbear (talk) 19:01, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.