Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smoking Vapor (electronic cigarette brand)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:42, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Smoking Vapor (electronic cigarette brand) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No third-party WP:RS. Fails WP:NCORP. WP:PROD contested by article author without comment. Note that the Forbes reference is a "contributor" article, which is basically a blog. shoy (reactions) 23:08, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 00:16, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 00:16, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Nothing that satisfies WP:CORPDEPTH. I reiterate what the nominator said about Forbes. It is a contributor piece so there is no real editorial oversight. The Inc.com references is simply a profile so that also fails. --CNMall41 (talk) 00:31, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete -- does not meet WP:NCORP; promotional 'cruft. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:52, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.