Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Society of Free Christians

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:01, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Society of Free Christians

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable organization. I searched for sources under both its original name, as well as its later name of "Religious Society of St Simon", and came up with nothing. Note that there was an older organization with the same name from the 19th century that some results appeared for, but they seem to be completely unrelated to the group that this article is about. I initially PRODed this without realizing that a PROD had already been attempted years back, so it was declined. Rorshacma (talk) 16:48, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma (talk) 16:48, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma (talk) 16:48, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma (talk) 16:48, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- This looks like a denomination; and we normally allow articles on denominations. The problems are a lack of sources and That there is no article either on the predecessor or successor. There is thus no indication as to the scale of its membership or anything else. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:08, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - while we like to list all denominations, this one is so small that it has not gained significant coverage. Literally it has gotten zero coverage. Bearian (talk) 15:34, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not enough coverage to establish notability. ~riley (talk) 23:32, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.