Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Songs of the Way (Sami Yusuf album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. --MelanieN (talk) 02:20, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Songs of the Way (Sami Yusuf album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NALBUMS Gaijin42 (talk) 16:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. This coi editor has been creating multiple versions of another album too, under slightly different names, but I've speedied all those I've found Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:43, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 00:34, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 16:36, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Has no reliable sources, and this editor may be a paid advocate for Sami Yusuf and his albums, as all his edits have been related to Yusuf. It also says on his talk page that this user's Commons account states that he is the "designer and admin of Sami Yusuf", thus giving him a WP:COI. By far fails both WP:GNG and WP:NALBUMS. In the best interest of Wikipedia, ~Ngeaup (talk) 16:58, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.