Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonny Arguinzoni

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidhe 19:40, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sonny Arguinzoni

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relies almost exclusively on primary sources. The reference claimed to be from Yahoo Finance is actually a press release ([1]). Upon searching ([2]), any other references are also either press releases or very brief mentions. No indication of notability. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 00:09, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 00:09, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 00:09, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:13, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there was a fairly in depth piece in the LA Times, but I could not find any other non-primary sources like it. TheAwesome Hwyh 00:32, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. TheAwesome Hwyh 00:33, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, discussed at sufficient length in both the article mentioned above and also in third party books:here, here, and here. So he meets GNG.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 22:27, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per the book sources shown above and the LA Times piece which is particularly convincing because it includes criticism of the subject which clearly indicates its independence, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:23, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:27, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This article could use a great deal of cleanup, but the book sources look legit. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 16:57, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Far from a good article. However BLP issues merely need some sources, even if they are no independent ones. Victory Outreach is certainly a notable Christina ministry. Since we do not have an article on it, having one on the founder will have to serve. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:59, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.