Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soumyadipta Banerjee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:20, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Soumyadipta Banerjee

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Enritely WP:SPAM and WP:PROMO. User attempted to use WP:AFC and was denied so they just went ahead and created the article. Loaded with WP:PEACOCK. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:20, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:25, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:25, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:25, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: It's such a blatant piece of spam that I'm tempted to G11 it. However, chose to not interrupt with afd, so we could deal with any further attempt of creation of this topic. Subject at best can make a claim of one-event notability (for writing a stupidest piece of article). Rest coverage are by him, not about him. Fails WP:JOURNALIST and WP:GNG. Anup [Talk] 02:25, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable blogger.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:29, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - poorly referenced and existence for only promotion. Sagecandor (talk) 02:52, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails GNG. This could have been marked for CSD. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 17:23, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete.Classic spam.Should have been ASD-ed.Suppport comments by User:Anupmehra.Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 09:48, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.