Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Park action figures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 01:51, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

South Park action figures

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Within the world of action figures and merchandise, can't see why this particular line is notable, or why the action figures warrant an article any more deservedly than the line of t-shirts, dolls, magnets, stickers, etc. If notability can't be established, this is essentially an indiscriminate collection of information. SoSaysChappy (talk) 15:22, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as much as a fan of the show and as much of being an inclusionist I am, this "stuff" is truly pointless and actually uninformative. Nergaal (talk) 02:15, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:27, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No more trashy than the average WP article. And one article on the action figures of a very popular, and cult-popular, TV show is probably not a bad thing. I bet Star Wars action figures have a hundred articles here. Northwestgnome (talk) 03:07, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Notability is not inherited. Plus...WP:OTHERSTUFF. - SoSaysChappy (talk) 03:23, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect & Merge. Article should be redirected, and information merged into the article South Park. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 09:38, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:49, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect and merge per RightCowLeftCoast. Orderinchaos 19:04, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indication of notability and no 3rd party sources. Would appear as trivial if merged. OrangeDog (τ • ε) 13:17, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.