Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southern Vectis route 2
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete all. —Darkwind (talk) 20:11, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Southern Vectis route 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
After the Deletion of Southern Vectis route 1 which was supported by consensus this is a bulk deletion to debate the remaining lists. These are Non-notable bus routes, The articles are sourced to a number of of sources which are either primary or tangential to the route as a whole neither of which establish notability per the General notability guidleines which require "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Any key information can be inserted into the Southern Vectis article but doesn't need its own sprawling article with an unsourced/unsourceable history. Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 17:14, 8 April 2013 (UTC) The other articles nominated under this reasoning are:[reply]
- Southern Vectis route 3 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Southern Vectis route 4 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Southern Vectis route 5 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Southern Vectis route 6 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Southern Vectis route 7 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Southern Vectis route 8 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Southern Vectis route 9 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Southern Vectis route 12 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Southern Vectis route 25 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Island Breezers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Others exist but will be done in another batch. Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 17:30, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:36, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:37, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom - Anyone with sense would check the operators website, not WP! Davey2010 Talk 00:21, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Fail WP:GNG and WP:NOTTRAVEL.--Charles (talk) 18:37, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. As route 1 has been deleted it clearly shows us that this article is not notable. Also per Davey, Who seriously will look on WP for this except a few people interested in buses. Go to wikia if it must but it should not stay here. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 17:19, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.