Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Development Network
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 13:52, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Space Development Network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable network "In April 2015 Louis met Sanjay and Sujay through social media. They formed a Facebook group called SDN (Space Development Network)." The user who created this article is "Sujay", clearly self-promotion, and no reliable source cited. QuantumRealm (meow • pawtrack) 13:49, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:35, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:35, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete sources are their own website (with a broken link going to a list of area codes) and a local news fluff piece. I was unable to find any other notrivial mentions, though the name is generic enough that isn't definitive. Searching for the topic gives http://developspace.info/ (perhaps the intended target of the broken link) and a couple mentions of someone named Doug Plata as the founder of this or an identically named project, who is not on the page at all but appears to be at least somewhat legitimate. Given the lack of any other coverage, I kind of doubt the existence of this "global network" as anything other than a vanity project. Rusalkii (talk) 06:34, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.