Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Launch System

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was MISSEDTHEJO. (non-admin closure) — J947 ^{(user | cont | ess)}, at 00:07, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Space Launch System

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A complete and utter waste of time and money. Just bin it or merge it to Falcon Heavy. ^{[April Fools!]} Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 01:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Just because something Is a complete waste of time and Money, It Shouldn't be Systematically deletED. The SLS sHould be kEpt. That's Just nOt in any of Wikipedia's policies. NASA clearly is still building it [1]. OkayKEnji ^{(talk page)} 08:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Too Soon Projects of that magnitude can't be cancelled unless at least 25 years have elapsed. We don't delete James Webb Space Telescope for the same reason, at least not before 2021. Renerpho (talk) 09:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Destroy the rocket per nom. Falcon Heavy and New Glenn are enough for the Artemis program. --Soumyabrata ^{stay at school} _{wash your shirt} ^{to be killed by coronavirus} 10:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was MISSEDTHEJO. (non-admin closure) — J947 ^{(user | cont | ess)}, at 00:07, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Actually, it is IMISSEDTHEJOKE. --Soumyabrata ^{stay at home} _{wash your hands} ^{to protect from coronavirus} 09:47, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]