Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spadout.com
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:59, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Spadout.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested PROD. Doesn't seem to pass WP:CORP or WP:WEB. Wperdue (talk) 00:37, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I disagree, I believe Spadout is a notable website that is very important to the outdoor sports community. At the present time this article does not do it justice. I'm in the process of finding some additional secondary sources and request postponement of deletion until I finish doing so. Thanks. Washburnmav (talk) 19:55, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment If you can improve its sources to prove some notability, I'm all for keeping it. Wperdue (talk) 20:58, 21 May 2009 (UTC)wperdue[reply]
- I disagree, I believe Spadout is a notable website that is very important to the outdoor sports community. At the present time this article does not do it justice. I'm in the process of finding some additional secondary sources and request postponement of deletion until I finish doing so. Thanks. Washburnmav (talk) 19:55, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:04, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Well, here we are a week later in the same situation, a lack of sufficient in-depth coverage in independent sources to establish notability under WP:WEB, WP:CORP or even just WP:NOTE. Drawn Some (talk) 00:53, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Doesn't pass WP:WEB, no real references within the first four pages of GSearch, nothing on GNews, Alexa ranking 97K -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 04:32, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:15, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.