Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St Mungo's Primary School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Metros (talk) 12:54, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

St Mungo's Primary School

Elementary school without assertion of notability. PROD was contested with requets to list the article on AfD. -- Sent here as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 08:54, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non notable. AnteaterZot 10:41, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - for some reason the nominator notified me instead of the author of the article. My only involvement here was to be the admin who removed the prod tag. Will someone please notify the proper party(ies)? --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 11:11, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I notified you because you contested the PROD. The article authors had already been notified of the PROD, but I will notify them of the AfD too. --B. Wolterding 13:19, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - OK, great; thanks. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 04:28, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 14:53, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 14:55, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Turnip I'd probably delete all primary schools but, since there's no consensus to do that, there's little point in treating his one differently. Shrug.--Doc^g 14:58, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
But what about all the reliable sources? (Not that those kind of things ever convinced me, but mileage may vary.) The school was (trivially) mentioned in the Record just last month, in connection with Alistair McKever. A redirect to an lovely annotated list of primary schools in Glasgow would be less bother, and it wouldn't have needed an AfD. Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:23, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to create that list. --B. Wolterding 08:23, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OUTCOMES isn't a guideline, just a list. If you feel the article should be kept, please vote for keep. (I don't think the article should be kept, though.) I'm fine with the idea of a list. CRGreathouse (t | c) 18:05, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable, A7-able. CRGreathouse (t | c) 18:05, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete if a primary school is notable, then the notable matters are the first things mentioned in a stub. So this one isn't notable, it doesn't meet WP:N and it doesnt meet WP:ORG.Ga rr ie 03:34, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.