Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Suvarna

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:38, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Star Suvarna

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Few sources exist, and none of them are about reviews of "Star Suvarna". GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:24, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ~SS49~ {talk} 02:01, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ~SS49~ {talk} 02:01, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:BROADCAST. Have you searched for sources in the station's language? Any TV channel in India is going to have millions of viewers. Legacypac (talk) 04:55, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
While WP:BROADCAST does speak of presumption of notability in case of TV channels that produce original programming, it does not, in and of itself, establish notability for a media outlet such as this one going by the absence of multiple independent and secondary reliable sources thereby not passing the muster at WP:GNG. Delete — Nearly Headless Nick {c} 12:39, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:52, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:BROADCAST "Cable television - Generally, national or regional cable channels are presumed notable." For example, one source said it was 4th overall viewership impressions in India for a week in 2016. There are more sources on the channel. StrayBolt (talk) 15:16, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.