Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Static interpretation of time

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:16, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Static interpretation of time

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Proposed redirect to Eternalism (philosophy of time).

No references, written like an essay, would already be WP:TNT.
All the useful content in this article is already covered under Eternalism (philosophy of time).

. Opal|zukor^(discuss) 12:18, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Philosophy and Science. Opal|zukor^(discuss) 12:18, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per nom. - car chasm (talk) 12:41, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- no one's permission is necessary to redirect a page. Why not just redirect it and discuss it with interested editors if anyone objects? The page history shows that no one has tried this. This would be much more appropriate than an AFD since nom's rationale already admits the subject is notable. Central and Adams (talk) 12:59, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A synonym for an idea much more widely discussed under other names (eternalism, block universe, B-theory), and not a synonym that is common enough itself to justify being made into a redirect. XOR'easter (talk) 20:09, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing to save here. Next time try WP:PROD. Johnjbarton (talk) 13:23, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
delete, not a common term, not needed as a redirect. Artem.G (talk) 17:45, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing to save. My very best wishes (talk) 22:30, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.