Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StationRipper (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The one "keep" agrees that the sources are bad, so... Sandstein 21:21, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

StationRipper

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement. There are some mentions in passing, but I am not seeing any in-depth coverage. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:22, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. —AE (talk • contributions) 09:46, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —AE (talk • contributions) 09:46, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ward99 (talk)

The p2p articles did, as I recall, talk specifically about the app. The other two do in passing. Doing a quick search there seems to be a lot of sites talking about it and is included in a lot of articles about ripping internet radio. It's also the first google hit for record internet radio.

Agree that sources need to be updated. I don't have a lot of time to do this now - I worked on the article way back in the way (and still is a piece of software I use daily). I personally think it's well known enough to keep the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ward99 (talk • contribs) 21:12, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:01, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:01, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:01, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:01, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —AE (talk • contributions) 10:52, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, gidonb (talk) 07:06, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can do better than this. The inclusion standard for software is not anybody's presumption about how well-known it is, or where it ranks in a Google search — the inclusion standard for software is being the subject of enough reliable source coverage to clear WP:GNG. But Slashdot and p2pnet are both blogs, not reliable sources for establishing the notability of anything, and StationRipper is just namechecked in, not the subject of, the only two references here that are reliable sources. When trying to establish notability, what we're looking for is dedicated coverage about the thing in media, not blog posts or its name getting mentioned in coverage about other things. Bearcat (talk) 14:32, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Only one !vote, not enough to determine consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kirbanzo (talk) 07:02, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.