Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steadman TS100

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Jaguar SS100. v/r - T P 13:22, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Steadman TS100

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Twelve replicas of the Jaguar SS100 using modern components by a (possibly obscure Kit car) manufacturer. What a great idea - I'd love to drive one! Article would nevertheless appear to fail the general notability guidelines. Shirt58 (talk) 12:41, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:13, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:13, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:12, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and Redirect. Has a reference, and seems closely linked with Jaguar SS100 which could stand some more content. Haus^Talk 02:57, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 00:42, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and Redirect to Jaguar SS100. I agree with Haus - this is an obvious case for merging IMHO--Cailil ^talk 12:32, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: A passing mention of 12 kit cars in a book by a no-name publisher that you can pick up for AUD$ 2.50, marked down to AUD$ 1.00 at a cheap books stall in the Indro Shopping Town? Delete, delete, delete!--Shirt58 (talk) 13:31, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect. (Though there's not much to merge). As the nominator says; I'm sure it's a fine product but we can't justify having an article on every obscure product. bobrayner (talk) 08:20, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.