Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Eisner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:05, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Eisner

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable boxing promoter; the only source I can find about him is an obituary, and the article looks very promotional. (Why is there a poem?) Poydoo can talk and edit 16:48, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Poydoo can talk and edit 16:48, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Boxing-related deletion discussions. Poydoo can talk and edit 16:48, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Poydoo can talk and edit 16:48, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Concur with nom. I did find some passing mentions in a newspaper article on Boxing. Nothing close to meeting GNG. Hard to believe this article has survived so long MB 18:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is the type of article that makes wikipedia look silly in the media. A poem has no place in an article about a promoter and this fellow fails to hit the notability mark. Down for the punch, pun intended. Oaktree b (talk) 02:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. This article reads like an obituary. A Google search found no wide coverage by reliable sources. It sorely fails WP:GNG. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 22:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:19, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.