Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Mantis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. v/r - TP 01:57, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Steve Mantis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Clearly does not meet the notability guideline as per WP:POLITICIAN Mr. No Funny Nickname (talk) 21:43, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Mr. No Funny Nickname (talk) 21:47, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. —Mr. No Funny Nickname (talk) 21:47, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. There are more than enough media articles about this individual to meet WP:GNG. I have reduced the bulk of the self-referencing content in the article. Nipsonanomhmata (Talk) 00:04, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Per several reliable sources that establish notability of the topic. Northamerica1000 (talk) 00:14, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: As per debates on articles for a number of other prominent individuals running for election but never elected, this likewise meets WP:GNG even if it does not meet WP:POLITICIAN. Ahblair (talk) 00:09, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.