Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Titus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Erik9 (talk) 04:52, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Steve Titus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a wrongfully convicted individual who appears to otherwise completely unremarkable (see WP:BLP1E). Although the story of this wrongful conviction won a Pulitzer Prize for "Local Investigative Specialized Reporting", this amounts to a short sentence in the article and the author's name is incorrect. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 11:15, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with the nom's findings.ChildofMidnight (talk) 14:34, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]- Weak Keep per rename. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:03, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Reason for delete is wrong. The man is dead so WP:BLP1E is incorrect; the L in BLP stands for living people. The man/event was so notable that a book was written on it and he was a source of a Pulitzer Prize. If people want to retitle the article, it's ok with me but to kill it is not right. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Murder_of_David_Lynn_Harris gives us some guidance as a book was written on that except that it did not win a Pulitzer Prize. That other article was kept. The reasoning for that article gives us guidance (and no "other crap exists" excuse"; the other stuff is given for guidance not as a "me too" proposal) Acme Plumbing (talk) 03:43, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- If it was renamed to be about the case I could probably live with it although I think it needs some clean up. If the story won a pullitzer prize I think that's a pretty good indication of notability, but not necessarily for the person what was the subject of the story, but for the story itself. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:46, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Suggest name change to "Conviction of Steve Titus" (or possibly "Wrongful conviction of Steve Titus") Acme Plumbing (talk) 03:56, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Wrongful conviction of Steve Titus is okay with me. It should be a bit more about the story winning a pullitzer perhaps, and less a play by play. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:03, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Suggest name change to "Conviction of Steve Titus" (or possibly "Wrongful conviction of Steve Titus") Acme Plumbing (talk) 03:56, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- If it was renamed to be about the case I could probably live with it although I think it needs some clean up. If the story won a pullitzer prize I think that's a pretty good indication of notability, but not necessarily for the person what was the subject of the story, but for the story itself. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:46, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Rename may be justified, but topic is clearly notable. Subject of a Pulitzer-winning series of articles, discussed in detail in this book. Bongomatic 06:44, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.