Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stony

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:06, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stony

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable artist, fails WP:GNG. Koala15 (talk) 03:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't see any evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources; the majority of hits are social networking. If someone finds Icelandic sources, the article can be recreated. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The Icelandic sources added seem to satisfy the GNG. Would be nice to see some English-language sources, though. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:17, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:BIO. ///EuroCarGT 04:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep, seems like improvements were made. ///EuroCarGT 03:38, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iceland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I found and added two articles entirely about him in Icelandic national newspapers and one in a local weekly, satisfying WP:GNG. There may well be more. Better results searching on the Icelandic spelling, "Þorsteinn". Yngvadottir (talk) 19:48, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep as per Yngvadottir. Only a weak keep as there are only two national newspapers, and I don't trust Google Translate enough to make a proper judgement on the level of coverage in said sources. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:44, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep as per Lukeno94. Hafspajen (talk) 18:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.