Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stowarzyszenie Harcerstwa Katolickiego Zawisza

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Kurykh (talk) 02:10, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stowarzyszenie Harcerstwa Katolickiego Zawisza

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks notability Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:32, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

keep although the English version is unreferenced, there are references on the Polish edition. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:47, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Request admin void three related AfDs Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Sudan Girl Guides Association/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Association of Top Achiever Scouts/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stowarzyszenie Harcerstwa Katolickiego Zawisza as WP:WIKIHOUNDING by User:Sportsfan 1234 per Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Wikipedia:Harassment.23Wikihounding_by_User:Sportsfan_1234- There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 02:39, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:52, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per rationale of Graeme Bartlett, there are references on the Polish edition, and extra care should be observed regarding WP:SYSTEMIC BIAS per non-Anglosphere topics.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 18:45, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 00:28, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 03:38, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I would expect the National Scouting Association of any country to be notable. Whether it is in fact notable may depend on whether the membership of 3300 refers to members (scouts) or to scout troops: if the latter, it is certainly notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:13, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. @Peterkingiron: Note that this is not the Polish National Scouting Organisation. That's the Polish Scouting and Guiding Association. This is a fairly small Catholic scouting organisation which is separate from the main national association. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:57, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. I think the sources I see as snippets at [1] are likely sufficient for more than coverage in passing. Without being able to see them fully, I cannot vote keep, but neither do I see sufficient grounds for deletion. At worst, this should be merged to History of Scouting in Poland, through considering I see mostly keep votes above, I don't think it is necessary. I'll ping expert on Polish scouting, User:Halibutt. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 16:34, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - There does seem to be sufficient, if minor coverage. Smmurphy^(Talk) 15:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.