Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Student Police Cadet Project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 15:26, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Student Police Cadet Project

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Inappropriate overdetailed promotional article about police cadet program in one particular Indian state. The detail could of course be trimmed, but there would be insufficient content left for an article. The references are just the usual notices DGG ( talk ) 08:47, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:05, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:05, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep – I see a lot of coverage about what seems to be a rather important education system. The article needs trimming, but it needs to be kept as well. If the article isn't fixed and the promotional aspect isn't removed soon, I could see a deletion being possible. Redditaddict6 9 07:15, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:27, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: does not meet WP:NORG with the coverage being routine and / or WP:SPIP. Promotional 'cruft; the content belongs on the org's web site, not here. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:37, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 21:07, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The subject passes WP:SIGCOV due to mainstream newspapers. e.g. The Hindu [1] The page views also does not justify deletion [2]--DBig Xrayᗙ 21:43, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.