Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunisa Jett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:21, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sunisa Jett

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Totally unsourced BLP about Thai actress and model. The only references there have ever been in the article, to a blog and another Wiki, have been removed for not being reliable sources, leaving the article without any source of any kind. Thomas.W ^{talk to me} 14:26, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unsourced WP:BLP violation. --DAJF (talk) 23:02, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I note that the article, along with several others nominated by the nominator at much the same time, is an an unsourced BLP only because the nominator removed the existing sources immediately before nominating it. A quick glance suggests that the sources were just as unreliable as the nominator has stated - but, in this kind of situation, it is almost always better to leave the links in, point out their unreliability in the nomination and leave the rest of us to make up our own minds (the one real exception is if the linked page contains malware or falls under Wikipedia blacklisting criteria). PWilkinson (talk) 20:43, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The only "source" was a blog, and the removal of it is mentioned in the nomination, so checking the "reference" can be easily done through the page history (through the direct link to it that is prominently featured in the nomination...). Thomas.W ^{talk to me}

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.